African governments used the 81st United Nations General Assembly in New York to present investment priorities spanning critical minerals, infrastructure, energy, manufacturing, agriculture, healthcare and technology, as governments seek to attract capital while retaining greater influence over how their economies and resources are developed.
A series of meetings convened by the U.S.-Africa Business Center, alongside engagements involving African governments, US companies and multilateral institutions, brought representatives from Ghana, Namibia, Guinea, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Nigeria into discussions with American business leaders.
The meetings illustrate a broader shift in the international economic conversation around Africa. Rather than treating the continent principally as a destination for external capital, governments are increasingly seeking partnerships that align investment with domestic industrialisation, infrastructure development, value addition and economic diversification.

Ghanaian President John Dramani Mahama’s appearance at the Nasdaq MarketSite on 23 September was one of the week’s most visible engagements. Nasdaq records show that Mahama rang the Closing Bell in New York, where Ghana’s economic opportunities were presented to an international financial audience. (Nasdaq)
According to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s U.S.-Africa Business Center, discussions involving Ghana focused on manufacturing, agro-processing, energy, mining, technology and healthcare. A separate US-Ghana presidential roundtable brought together more than 75 business executives, investors and government representatives.
The significance of such engagements extends beyond the visibility attached to a Wall Street ceremony. For Ghana and other African economies, the central question is whether international commercial interest can translate into productive investment, employment, technology transfer and stronger domestic value chains.

Namibia’s engagement centred on its potential role as a logistics and trade gateway in Southern Africa. President Netumbo Nandi-Ndaitwah participated in a roundtable with US business representatives, where opportunities were discussed across critical minerals, green hydrogen, mining, energy, infrastructure, agriculture and youth development.
For Namibia, these sectors intersect with a wider effort to position the country within emerging regional and global supply chains. The challenge for policymakers is to ensure that resource development generates domestic economic linkages rather than remaining concentrated around the extraction and export of commodities.
In Guinea, the focus was particularly concentrated on investment promotion. The U.S.-Africa Business Center launched a Guinea Investment Guide during an executive roundtable involving senior Guinean officials and private-sector representatives. The publication identifies mining, infrastructure, health and agriculture among areas in which Guinea is seeking investment.
The country’s mineral potential has gained international attention through the development of the Simandou iron ore project, while the government has also sought to expand infrastructure and productive capacity. The investment case therefore extends beyond resource extraction to questions of infrastructure, public administration, skills and the ability of domestic businesses to participate in new economic activity.

The Democratic Republic of Congo provided one of the clearest examples of investment discussions moving towards a specific project. On 23 September, the US Trade and Development Agency signed an agreement with Congolese-based Buenassa Resources to fund a pre-feasibility study for a proposed copper and cobalt refinery in Lualaba Province.

The proposed refinery is significant because it relates directly to the DRC’s long-standing objective of increasing local processing of minerals rather than exporting a greater proportion of raw materials. The USTDA says the study will examine potential feedstock suppliers, technical design and the economic and financial parameters required for the project’s development.
The same week, USTDA announced a separate feasibility study aimed at improving power infrastructure in Lualaba and Zambia’s North-Western Province along the Lobito Corridor. The agency said the project is intended to strengthen electricity supplies for mining operations and more than three million people in the two countries. (ustda.gov)
These projects also demonstrate the competing interests surrounding Africa’s critical-minerals economy. African states are seeking infrastructure, processing capacity and economic diversification, while international partners are seeking reliable access to minerals required for industries including energy and advanced technology. How these interests are balanced will shape the developmental impact of the emerging mineral economy.

Nigeria’s engagement focused on investment across a broader industrial base. The country’s Minister of Industry, Trade and Investment, Jumoke Oduwole, joined representatives of the US Chamber, the American Business Council Nigeria and more than 70 business and government leaders for a strategic investment dialogue. The U.S. Chamber reported that three memoranda of understanding were signed involving Promethean Resources, Vermeer and Renewvia Energy.
At the continental level, the discussions extended beyond individual national markets. The U.S.-Africa Business Center and the Corporate Council on Africa convened a private-sector dialogue involving African Union representatives, US government officials and executives from sectors including finance, infrastructure, energy, mining, digital infrastructure, technology and logistics.
The emphasis on regional projects is particularly relevant as African countries continue efforts to deepen intra-African trade and infrastructure connectivity under the African Continental Free Trade Area. Investment that strengthens cross-border infrastructure can potentially support African markets as well as international trade.

Healthcare also featured in the New York discussions. The U.S.-Africa Business Center participated in an AUDA-NEPAD strategy discussion examining how greater African ownership of health systems can be translated into investment, including through improvements in procurement, trade and policy frameworks.
Taken together, the engagements point to a more complex commercial relationship between Africa and the United States. American companies are pursuing opportunities in African markets, while African governments are seeking capital, technology, infrastructure and market access on terms that support their own development priorities.
The durability of this engagement will ultimately depend less on high-profile meetings than on whether announced partnerships become operational projects, whether value is retained within African economies and whether investment contributes to productive capacity and livelihoods.
For African governments, the task is therefore not simply to attract foreign investors. It is to negotiate partnerships capable of advancing national and regional economic objectives while strengthening African participation in the value chains that emerge from them.
For US companies, the opportunity is similarly broader than accessing resources or consumer markets. Sustainable commercial relationships will increasingly require engagement with African industrial strategies, domestic enterprises and the continent’s evolving regional economic architecture.






